Basic Physics of Newton First Law: Regarding Motion of Objects

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Bagikan :

Tweet

Here whenever you can avoid using physical symbols or formulas that often make the allergy of students or someone who studied physics. The objective is to understand and understand that it is not for the purposes of the count of typical physics formulas. Well, I just started from Newton's first code of movement.

Newton's first law regarding the movement of objects

First of all I conceived and understood with the mind I especially when I was a child and in the full learning phase of the doctrine (which I am thankful for) that the object was moving because there are patterns that encourage or make it move. I'm a daily experience with view and ray that objects around me most are silent objects, and the alias is not moving. Next my mind is a bit that my curiosity is always just saying that he is basically or the natural meme rest motionless. That way so that it's constantly moving and never stop or silent, the object must be driven, in the clouds or in doing God. My experience also said that like this. Motorcycle If you've run out of gas will also stop yourself; walk also take a step on the swing away, if you stop a step then I move; I have to pay or lift the chair that I usually live to watch TV when I plan to move the presidency. The president will be silent and motionless if I do not pay or lift and move it. Even since this incident is like the fact of truth, I may be terrified and frightened if this chair is the way alone or switches itself. I will then search for what causes the president who moves himself. If anyone presses it. I'll find the reason and it's impossible for the president to move alone. So he says my little heart. If I do not find the sources or movement that caused the seats that are moving you might have freaked out and pointed out that the president has driven by ghosts or something supernatural beings that are out of the real world I am. I'm sure most of us say I think so. Do you think so?

Over time I also know that my little mind is a common way of searching (common sense) that many people are still following in the old. Historians of philosophy prior to the Galileo era most of the force that understands this type. When Galileo crossed different views, Newton followed. Don't you think that too?

I know from the education that the Earth is round I know that our solar system is nine planets (now up to 8 planets because Pluto is no longer included in our solar system because of the very small and its path to cutting off the other planets road). I know that the moon around the Earth (moon Revolution against Earth). I know the Earth rotates (alternately). I know it's where I live and it was circled or around the sun (revolution). What then to do all this with Newton's first law regarding the proposal? This is the dilemma that seems to occur.

In fact the less accurate I discussed and raised the example of planets and sun or moon in this paper because to understand this need to know the aspects of Newton's thinking more about gravity. But what it should make, because I think the example of the revolution and rotation so it is better suited to explain Newton's physics laws first. Let me first talk a little bit about gravity. I still can give an example or an explanation of Newton's law, after what is often discussed in school textbooks mandatory or university. But no mind, I actually wanted to discuss and understand Newton's first law in a way that fits my life experience, not with the method of textbook methodology.

I know that something if thrown into the air, he will return to the ground or to the bottom. Throw a stone when I want to pluck the mango and the rocks back to the ground if they are in luck you want my choice of mango in a way the program will also fall on the ground aliases to the ground. It was then examined by primary school teachers as well as my parents (with the doctoral commission) caused by the gravity of the Earth. What is the attraction of Earth? So I asked. Yes gravity that causes objects to be attracted to the earth. So they said. Refined Cook-the sit, huh? Anything he has a block of my teacher said, will 

always retreat. ' ll, I take it that this statement is correct.

Back to the problem of the chairs pushed by the ghosts. Here, the conclusion can be drawn that I do not think anything moves without anyone pushing it. I think something or that the chair is supposed to be silent and motionless. Then when I was looking at the fact that the moon moves around the Earth every day, for 24 hours continuously without stopping, as the the move from the Earth rotates within 24 hours continuously without stopping and moving every one time around the sun 24 hours down. Because it is a reasonableness and I have also seen and proved that I came to the conclusion that actually says the presence of the moon and the ground. I have no trauma or amazement about this fact.

However, I gradually know that my confidence between two seats still and the earth and the rotating moon are contradictory. The Earth and the moon must also be silent place and cannot move if you follow my wegat first. But actually the moon moves. What makes her move? Is there someone or something that has pushed him down that he will continue to move. Is there a rocket that he's constantly pushing for? Or there's a ghost making it move like that, yes there's definitely something I paid for. God did that for sure. Isn't he the Almighty? Ah sure he continues to push the moon at any time to move like that. That was my mind, but unless he was tired, God did it only. Allah Almighty where he is tired to do it this way.

If you involve ghosts or God in this matter, the understanding or investigation we have on rotation and the revolution in the Earth will be a dead end and still leave the contradiction. Then Newton came with her first law of motion Newton on me giving the solution. Newton said, which is a bit different to my understanding of the typical ghost head. He said:

It is basically always a regular move straight or silent unless you are forced to convert this movement through certain styles.

It's the thing that's equal to Mr. Dooku. The objects of conquest are really silent, basically? Turns out there's a difference that Newton says it's going straight on a row without anyone pushing it? Yes. Newton said that without any encouragement, effort or method (work/method here is in terms of dealing with physics and not because there is a difference when it is in physics) that constantly on an object can go ahead. Next it would be immortal in the case of endless movement if it wasn't There's something to pause. Reverend Cook anyway? Yes, say what Newton said.

The moon moves relentlessly because it basically has this kind of circumstance of the old. It will continue to move relentlessly until the millions of years longer. Well the Earth moves from the past to the present and will continue to move in the future. It's going to move at a steady speed or the same thing. This is the intent of this step. Leadership is not required to do so. Why is the moon spinning? Newton's words did not essentially move in a straight position. Spinning instead of straight? Yes right. We must not forget that Newton's first law is a partial phrase "unless it is forced to change that state with the forces that affect it"? Next the movement of the Moon goes on and not straight because there was a membrane. The pattern is? Nothing but the power of gravity. Then why didn't he fall on the floor? Suppose the Earth is flat and wide once and then the moon will surely fall on the ground. Unfortunately we know the Earth round, so that every time the moon is attracted to Earth, it is like followers of the celestial Orb of the Earth. Next he is still interested in the shape of the earth and follows it, and the result has been a transformation. It's like the marble movement, which played in the hollow tub. You can prove that next we have the solar system gas solved by Newton. Evidence from Galileo and Copernicus is an understanding of Newton's first law that has been strengthened.

So why does the seat you occupy every day to watch the office or the little boy with four eyes don't move? And if you push it, then you stop? Isn't that a violation of Newton's laws?

Explanation is the friction that causes the president to stop. If there is no attraction and friction then this chair is certainly as valid as the moon instead? You know that the correct friction can stop something friction is meant that there is a push behind a chair with an opposing movement is. Like a car brake or your car.

Tag : fisika